I have a character that's nonbinary. I'm more looking into a good mechanical way to change the pronouns for the character every time they change their presentation.
The (fictional) language they speak in technically doesn't have gendered third-person pronouns, but there's no way for me to actually communicate that smoothly (I asked that question and was told no). I did put into the manuscript something of a note on that. (Yes, I did use linguistics for this)
But... since I have to "translate" the thing into having all of these third-person pronouns and a bunch of second-person pronouns, I figure I could lean into it.
So, since this character is flux/fluid about their gender, I thought I could reinforce it to the reader by changing the third-person pronouns.
So is there a good way to indicate it will happen, so the reader doesn't get confused?
So far, I've set up the character before their introduction as more nonbinary, by having them change their gender presentation. They've introduced themselves as nonbinary. But I'd like to change the pronouns to reflect their stated presentation without the reader losing who I'm talking about.
More mechanics to get the reader to accept it without betraying the set-up rule that this language doesn't have gendered third-person pronouns.
TT This is why I wanted to drop them. This is a pain to get through.
BTW, I know the corner of the internet that says nonbinary people all should use "they" in fiction. Ludicrous. About 30% use open third-person pronouns.
BTW, Gender Fluid is not the same as "open pronouns". Conflating the two in Nonbinary identity and saying that the answer to the question in the other one is exactly the same as someone who is CHANGING THEIR presentation so you visually can see it is not the same thing as "Doesn't change their presentation" like the answers are addressing where the character "doesn't care" but has the same pronouns.
Gender Fluid and gender flux people are more than likely to change their presentation so that people outside of them can see it. Presentation means the clothes they wear, the way they wear their hair, the make up, voice, and physicality. If you dislike the idea that people can do this, then maybe this isn't the question for you to answer.
The answer on the other question constantly being shoved at me explicitly says that the character "doesn't care" about their presentation. This is entirely different from Gender fluidity, where they do care about their presentation and it would be visible.
Therefore, the grammar treatments should be different. How to introduce it would be different.
I explicitly said this in the line: by having them change their gender presentation and then I was accused openly of "not reading the other answer" and the following answers which explicitly say they won't change their gender presentation so other people WON'T know. This makes it different trans issues. Being upset that NB are different and need different things isn't going to help and frankly comes a little transphobic? Binary trans needs different things from someone gender flux from demigender, from gender fluid to agender. And treating the character with respect to their presentation, culture and language means I also respect those people in the real world.