4

I realized I start sentences with the, he, she, it, after and then all the time. So I'm starting to use verbs instead. Here is an example of something I wrote:

Erin left out a sigh. "Why am I thinking so much about this?"

She decided to forget about the thing, and go lie on bed instead. Talking to herself had really made her tired; a little bit more and she would go crazy. She reached to her desk and grabbed her phone. Hearing Benjamin's voice would probably snap her back to reality.

I remember having read about this long ago (but I don't remember if the author considered it good or bad writing).

  • English sentences can only ever start with nouns or a suitable substitute. Exceptions include phrases in the imperative and certain idioms and expressions. Pronouns can, and often should, be substituted for nouns in fiction as always referring to an object by its proper name/noun gets troublesome quickly; ask the guys behind Lojban. So you can't have a problem with 'over-using' pronouns. The structure might need some work and variation, but I can't help with that. What you call 'verbs' (talking-hearing-...) are gerunds or present participles, somewhat more 'nouns' than 'verbs'. – Mussri Dec 14 '12 at 17:47
  • @Mussri, can you cite a source for your assertion? – Lauren-Clear-Monica-Ipsum Dec 14 '12 at 18:52
  • @LaurenI, Which? Although now I think I should have said "English phrases can only ever start with nouns or a suitable substitute." which might not change anything so which part do you disagree with? – Mussri Dec 14 '12 at 19:43
  • 1
    @Mussri Okay, your new comment makes sense. But saying "English is an SVO language" (which describes how the grammar functions) is NOT semantically the same as saying "English sentences must START with a noun and END with a verb" (which demands the same structure of every sentence). The former is correct. The latter is demonstrably not. – Lauren-Clear-Monica-Ipsum Dec 15 '12 at 2:13
  • 5
    @Mussri No, not at all. It's a learning process for everyone. Why remove it just because it took a while for us to understand one another? The entire comment trail is worthwhile. – Lauren-Clear-Monica-Ipsum Dec 15 '12 at 21:13
12

Sentences should start with anything that makes grammatical and syntactical sense. Writers create, so create your own rules. As long as they make sense, your reader will understand.

Your example is actually a gerund, which does act as a noun, but consider these:

  • "To be or not to be?" (Starts with a preposition.)

  • "Brilliantly, he began his sentence with a verb." (Starts with an adverb.)

  • "Skilled and astute, he quickly posted his question on Stack Exchange." (Starts with an adjective.)

  • "And even some sentences can start with conjunctions." (Starts with ... a conjunction.)

I believe that all of these are correct.

| improve this answer | |
  • 6
    To be or not to be does not start with a preposition. It starts with an infinitive verb. – TRiG Feb 1 '13 at 23:56
8

None of your sentences start with verbs, though two of them start with gerunds, which is not quite the same thing. In any case, I think that you are fretting about nothing. If your sentences sound fine to you as an English speaker and they avoid the monotony that you were noticing before, then by all means write them however you want. I can't think of many things less useful for a writer than worrying about imaginary rules like "don't start with a verb".

| improve this answer | |
  • And, never use a preposition to end a sentence with. – Jay Sep 14 at 17:22
  • And it is incorrect to ever split an infinitive. – insectean Sep 15 at 18:05
6

Begin a sentence with a verb sometimes. See, I just did. Twice.

As others have noted, you're apparently confusing gerunds with verbs in your example. But that said, gerunds are perfectly good words and can be used to vary your sentence structure.

I don't know where you were told that a sentence can never begin with a verb. Imperative sentences (i.e. commands) routinely start with verbs: "Go to the store." "Bring me the book." Etc. It's relatively rare otherwise in English, as the conventional structure is subject-verb-object, but it's not unheard of. "Thinking quickly, Bob leaped for the door." "'Leaving so soon?' Sally asked." Sometimes it's effective to use a non-standard word order for emphasis or to save an unexpected word for last. "Left in the middle of the night, he did." "Kill me they might, but they will never defeat me."

If you find that you are in a rut and all your sentences follow the same pattern, then, as Tylerharms says, I would definitely make an effort to consciously break the pattern. (Now that you mention this, I have to look at my own writing and see if I've fallen into this!) Of course one should avoid the opposite extreme, of trying so hard to vary your sentence constructions that you over-use odd phrasings.

| improve this answer | |
  • "Run away! Run away!" – RonJohn Jun 14 '19 at 13:57
5

If you are struggling with variety in your sentence structure, I think you should make it a writing exercise to begin sentences with verbs. Then do an exercise where you begin sentences with adjectives. Then do an exercise where you begin sentences with words that rhyme with blue. Any and all techniques that force you out of your comfort zone and get you to practice new forms of writing are good. Ultimately, you should seek variety in your writing, but this is not something you just do. As you have found, once you get used to a certain organizational structure, you start thinking that way. Other sentence constructions have to become comfortable to you before you can start implementing them effectively. So, while the simple advice is to just unfetter yourself, the hard truth is that it's going to seem like you're writing gibberish until new writing constructions feel natural.

| improve this answer | |
0

Every word, and how you use it are tools in your toolbox. You can follow proper grammar, or twist it to barely understandable, and these are still just tools.

What happens when you start your sentences with verbs? What is that tool used for?

The verb is the meat of the sentence. It's the most important word in the sentence. In fact if you don't have one, then you have a fragment. Other words in the sentence just describe the verb. Who is doing, the action, how is the action being done. Other even less important words describe the actors who are doing the action. The more flowery the writing, the more words you have besides the verb.

So now let's think about starting with verbs. We are jumping straight to the most important part. We don't have time to waste with other words. This makes the writing feel fast, direct, intense, personal. If those are the things you want, start with a verb. If they are not, then surround the verb with other words to give it the feeling that you need.

As always writing is best when it has ups and down. Sentences should be of varied lengths, and structure. You can't use any one tool for the whole piece of writing. Use many tools to create something interesting and changing, where the grammar itself is part of telling the story.

| improve this answer | |
-1

I have pondered on this question for some time. My conclusion is this: providing the sentence makes sense to the writer and the reader, using the verb or the subject to open a sentence is fine. I don't agree with those who say that the subject should always come first. Writers are creative people. Rules are there for a reason, of course. It's redundant prepositions that writers need to be more aware of, in my opinion.

| improve this answer | |
  • I don't think 'the grammar police' will come after you - several other answers to this question have already pointed out that sentences can start with many different parts of speech. – DM_with_secrets Sep 14 at 7:53
  • 1
    This adds nothing to the existing answers. – Chenmunka Sep 14 at 15:39

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.