I am writing a proposal for my PhD. In the proposal I have included a chapter titled “Actuator Design”. Within that same chapter, can I include a section with the same name as that chapter, meaning the very same “Actuator Design” as I’ve already used?

3 Answers 3


You can include whatever sections you like; the real question is whether your advisor or committee will approve what you write. If the structure is made more logical, organized, and clear by having a section called “Actuator Design” within a chapter called “Actuator Design”, then go ahead and use such a section.

There are cases where structure would not be improved by such a section: for example, if the section were at the immediate beginning of the chapter and were introductory and general. In a case like that, dispense with the “Actuator Design” section name, and present its information at the chapter level. Then add section headings as necessary following that introduction.

You also might want to rename the chapter or the section. If “Actuator Design” is only a section of a chapter, then the chapter must actually cover more topics than “Actuator Design”, or the section must cover less. For example, if your “Actuator Design” chapter has two sections, called “Actuator Design – Overview” and “Actuator Design – Details”, perhaps just rename the sections to “Overview” and “Details”.


Yes you can.

But I'd like to add, you'd need to think and question why you would have a Chapter Head and a Section Head as the same name.

Normal practice would be to use chapter heads as a generic title as to what that particular chapter contains. Section heads would normally go into even more specific detail about the contents of the chapter.


Chapter Title - Actuator Design

Section Heading - Design Parameters, Design Specifications, Design limiting factors, and so on.


It's a poor style - why make it a section while the chapter should contain it, what are other contents of the chapter if one section covers its whole title.

But you can give it a subtitle:

  • Actuator design
    • Actuator design - overview


  • Actuator design
    • Actuator design - detailed description


If your chapter is to contain only one section, which covers the entire subject of the chapter, don't make any section and start writing the content directly under the chapter level.

  • I don't think it is mandatory to qualify with a 'sub- Title'
    – Kris
    Dec 2, 2012 at 8:39
  • @Kris: Either make the section name entirely dissimilar, or qualify with a subtitle, or don't make the section at all and write content directly on chapter level. Section with exactly the same title as the chapter is poor style.
    – SF.
    Dec 2, 2012 at 12:31
  • Many times function overrides style. In a Ph.D. thesis, style is important but only secondary to accuracy and taxonomy.
    – Kris
    Dec 2, 2012 at 13:06
  • 1
    @Kris: So what function does a section serve inside a chapter, if it's its only section and bears exactly the same title? Accuracy and taxonomy are a priority in the content. The form should prioritize clarity of presentation, and so avoid redundant elements.
    – SF.
    Dec 2, 2012 at 13:12
  • Agreed. If you just check randomly online or ask someone who is familiar, you will see exceptions to the preferred practice -- Chapter I titled identically to Section. Rare but not never, not incorrect. If OP has enough reason, there's no bar.
    – Kris
    Dec 2, 2012 at 13:14

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service and acknowledge you have read our privacy policy.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.