Can ibid. follow op. cit. instead of loc. cit. to convey "exactly as in the op. cit. above"?

Question

It would seem that the more familiar ibid. could be used instead of the more intricate loc. cit. in such a case.

For example if we have:

11. Stern, op. cit., p. 58.

and the subsequent citation is to also refer to Stern, p. 58 (precisely what loc. cit. is for), can it then be economically rendered as:

12. Ibid.

or should loc. cit. be used? It seems ibid. has generally supplanted loc. cit. for use in such instances.