Is it acceptable to leave out non-conversational tags when writing a dialogue between two people. To take an example

"I waited for you for a whole hour!" said Joan, as she entered the room.

"I really am sorry. I was so engrossed in my book that I did not notice the time," replied James, sheepishly.

"As excuses go, that is quite a shabby one," retorted Joan.

"It is nevertheless, the only one I have," James answered defensively.

which could also be written as

"I waited for you for a whole hour!" said Joan, as she entered the room.

"I really am sorry. I was so engrossed in my book that I did not notice the time," replied James, sheepishly.

"As excuses go, that is quite a shabby one."

"It is nevertheless, the only one I have."

In this example I have deliberately chosen a dialogue where it is possible to use tags that somehow qualify the nature of the response - which makes them acceptable. However, in a more general context a continual repetition of he said and she said by way of tag makes the exchange feel rather stilted - at least to my eye.

My question - is it OK to leave out tags altogether once the identity of the characters has been established? Is this more of a stylistic decision or one that is dictated by well accepted rules?

2 Answers 2


Yes, It is entirely appropriate to leave out tags identifying the speaker once who is speaking is clear. This is a very common pattern when there are only two speakers in a scene.

But, long sequences of characters' dialogue, with or without attribution tags, can read like the pacing is wrong -- too fast or too slow. This is because the setting fades away and our imaginations kind of get stuck filling up the space.

"Using action beats," he said, spinning his coffee cup in circles, "can mitigate that." Because they let characters interact and react with the environment, filling that imaginative space, and giving the author control of the scene's pacing. This is also a method to use when there are more than two characters speaking in a scene.


It's up to the author to determine if the tags have a purpose, or they're better omitted. Some points to consider include:

If there are more than two characters on the scene, it can get confusing who is speaking very fast. Oftentimes, naming each character who opens their mouth is a must.

Even when there are only two, it's good practice to include a tag every now and then to make sure the reader doesn't lose track. It can happen easily - we're an inattentive bunch. But denoting the speaker with every single line is generally far from necessary. About every third or fifth line, depending on their length, should be perfectly enough; sometimes even less. (Why not every fourth? Because that would mean it's always the same character who gets them.)

"Alice said" tags are also not the only way to make it clear whose line we're hearing at the moment.

Bob scratched his head. "Yeah I hear you, but what am I supposed to do about it?"

"I'm sure you'll think of something." Alice poured herself a new cup of cocoa and calmly took a sip. "You don't want to disappoint me, do you?"

Pairing the line with an action shows who's speaking.

More subtly, you can use the heroes' specific style of speech to help the reader's orientation. If Bob is an informal lad full of "man" and Alice is an old-fashioned sophisticated lady, we aren't too likely to mix them up.

That said, tags aren't only good for making sure we know who is speaking.

Tags and action descriptions provide a kind of visual context, or how should I put it, for the conversation. They help us see the characters and the scene, and remind us we aren't listening to two disembodied voices in a void. Used well, they add flavour and colours and mood. Used badly or too much, they stuff the text with repetitive, irrelevant or boring filler, adding nothing of worth.

They also serve as a break to set the rhythm, flow and pacing of the text to the right speed - if in the proper place in the text. Put in a wrong place, they'll hinder the pace where it should be faster.

And by the way, "said" is actually a fairly invisible word that can be used frequently. Some writers tend to avoid "said" so much they end up creating overly purple prose with their flowery verbs. Don't be too afraid of "said".

The bottom line of it all is, do what works best for your story. Find the right amount of tags, the right places for them, and the right way to phrase them. There isn't really a hard rule.

You absolutely can omit tags. Sometimes it's the good choice to do so. And sometimes it isn't.

If you aren't sure, it may be a good idea to show the draft of your story to a well-read and critical beta-reader.

  • 1
    If a character has a very obvious and unique accent, a word or phrase that only they use, or even just a personality that comes through strongly in their manner of speech, such quirks of character dialogue can serve as natural inherent tags. Make sure to give the reader time to get familiar with a dialogue quirk before relying on it, though.
    – Douglas
    Commented Nov 22, 2022 at 1:36
  • Great answer! Very informative. Thank you.
    – DroidOS
    Commented Nov 22, 2022 at 7:39
  • 2
    Another quirk that can keep things on track: Speakers who naturally use people's names a lot, a trait associated with sales people (and which I associate with used car salesmen and the like): "Alice, I hear you, but what am I supposed to do about it?"
    – Chris H
    Commented Nov 22, 2022 at 11:28

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service and acknowledge you have read our privacy policy.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.