Should you avoid introducing characters that talk one time and never talk again? I wrote a scene in a chapter where the main characters talks to a technician, and then the technician is never seen again, and I am not sure if I should remove it, because the scene gives a lot of information about the world and the technology used, so I am wondering if I should remove the character and if there's a better way to give out detailed information about the world.

  • 3
    Tertiary characters (who may appear in just one scene) are omnipresent in literature. Are you purposely trying to limit the number of characters in your work?
    – Alexander
    Commented Jul 29, 2021 at 1:29
  • I am wondering if I should avoid introducing characters that have no or little relevance to the plot.
    – Sayaman
    Commented Jul 29, 2021 at 1:35
  • Generally, it is very unusual not to have any characters appearing in one scene only, so this is totally Ok. But if you want to deliberately limit the number of characters, you'll have to find ways to do it.
    – Alexander
    Commented Jul 29, 2021 at 1:59
  • 1
    @Sayaman But why? As Alexander said, these sorts of characters are everywhere. Commented Jul 29, 2021 at 11:08
  • 2
    One reason to limit the number of characters could be if your work is a stage play script.
    – Alexander
    Commented Jul 29, 2021 at 16:55

4 Answers 4


Based on your description, while the technician is not pivotal the story, the main characters' interaction with the technician is important. This new information about the technology and the world informs your readers. I would only have concern if there is an in-depth back story of the technician that does not tell the readers anything about class, culture, or life experiences. Then it would be "irrelevant". However, using other characters through a question and answer format to explain the world is a very common technique to organically introduce your readers to new information.


Who says one off characters aren't relative to the story?

Say you have a story where the main character is the head of a company. Several hundred people work for this guy - you're not going to introduce all 351 employees in your story. You might have a handful of characters who routinely interact with your main character - these will be fleshed out characters that your readers know.

Now your main character comes in on a weekend to do some paper work (or whatever it is bosses do when they show at work on a Saturday morning) and runs into one of the employees doing some overtime.

You have several options:

  1. Boss says "Good morning," then pretty much ignores the employee.
  2. Boss addresses the employee by name, and stops for a chat that involves knowledge about the employee and their current position and tasks, then suggests the employee not stay too long because every body needs time to relax on the weekends.
  3. Boss doesn't recognize the employee, asks what the person is doing in the building, then throws a fit and sends the employee home because he (the boss) didn't authorize overtime for the employee's department.

The employee isn't important. What's important is how the boss interacts with the employee. This random encounter with a tertiary character is a chance to demonstrate what kind of person the boss is.

  1. Busy but polite.
  2. Interested in and knowledgeable about his employees and takes time to see how they are doing.
  3. Something of a jerk, or alternatively the company has financial problems and the boss is in a bad mood.

Make the Scene Work Harder, or Cut it

You can absolutely introduce a character for one scene. The real question is whether the scene is worthwhile as it is.

You describe the scene as if all it does is world-building. I would either expand it or cut it. Scenes need to do multiple things at once.

The most important thing I scene needs to do is provide a source of tension. Meeting the technician should have some risk.

Maybe the MC needs to convince the technician to do something, or the technician is trying to stop the MC from moving forward, etc. Without some kind of stakes, the scene will feel unsatisfying no matter how useful the world-building section is.

If the scene is unsatisfying: either cut it, or add to it until it is interesting.


As they say in show biz:

There are no small parts, only small actors.

Take this person and make their one line memorable. Think of it as a cameo by a famous actor past his or her prime.

  • It would be intensely irritating to a reader if every minor character was described in the detail that you suggest.
    – Chenmunka
    Commented Oct 6, 2021 at 8:22
  • I guess you don't like Dickens, then Secondly, where are you getting "the detail that you suggest"? Where do I say anything about providing detail about the minor character? Commented Oct 6, 2021 at 23:49

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service and acknowledge you have read our privacy policy.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.