1

I'm writing a novel which essentially has the main character go from place to place and retrieve a single object from each person they encounter.

My problem is that while I can think of possible conflicts within each chapter, an overarching conflict seems to elude me. Were it not for the fact that the main character is undergoing character development, the chapters would almost be able to be published as stand-alone segments.

Similar to TV mystery series where the main characters (detectives, coroners etc) are the same every episode but there's a new problem.

Is there a name for this kind of novel? Is this structure feasible/ engaging enough?

1

Is there a name for this kind of novel?

As others have pointed out, it could easily be called "serial storytelling", or even more specifically, "fetch quest of the week".

What you describe, however, also reminds me of a type of narrative called "frame story". Examples include, but are definitely not limited to:

The idea is to set up a narrative, and then insert other narratives in there, a "story within a story".

In order to create "an overarching sense of conflict" you can use a frame story to tie all the episodes together. You could have the main character directly addressing the reader, and tell their quests and tribulations, and maybe even have the main character add their own commentary.

Lovecraft has done this in his stories, usually they begin with a character who says, "I've seen things you wouldn't believe, I might commit suicide later, but I have to warn the world about this indescribable, fish-shaped ancient evil."

In the same vein, there are stories where the narrator says that they've "found" a manuscript (a trope called "false document" or "found manuscript" according to wikipedia), and are translating/transcribing it for posterity.

Furthermore, you could have a third party (depending on the setting, the main character's squire, their assigned FBI agent, a historian...) narrate or write about the main character's exploits. Or even go full meta and write about an author who is writing a story...

| improve this answer | |
0

I think I understand your problem and I don't have an answer to your question about a name. However, I do have a suggestion: write all the separate stories and then see if an overall conflict emerges or occurs to you. It is possible that while you are editing the first draft an idea will come to you or you may be more able to impose an idea.

Character development can be conflict. For example, someone who realises that their goal is selfish or that the goal is wrong is in conflict. Economic pressure -- the character keeps running out of money -- could link the stories. a turbulent relationship might work.

The overall conflict may not be directly linked to the stories and still hold the lot together. Think of 'One Thousand and One Nights'.

| improve this answer | |
0

This would be serial storytelling, which is quite commonly found on television these days, but originated in literature, though many of the most famous "serial" books are typically sold with the complete story intact, making it the literature equivelent to binge watching a season of television on Netflix.

Originally, the format was used by many authors to publish their books much quicker than publishing full length novels. Typically the author would sell the story to a literary magazine which would publish the next chapter in each issue and would typically publish the whole story over the course of a preset negotiated issue period (typically weekly or monthly). Others had in house writers who would either work on the next chapter of the same story or an anthology style. As I said, many a famous classical series were published in this way including "Uncle Tom's Cabin", many of Charles Dickens' works ("The Pickwick Papers" being the novel that established this style's viability), "Sherlock Holmes" (most were self contained adventures of the characters, but Hound of the Baskerville was a "multipart episode" equivalent for the time. The death of Sherlock Holmes was actually Doyle's attempt to leave the series despite the high fan demand for the works.

Serialization did make the jump to other mediums, including Comics, Film, Radio, Television. During the golden age and to a lesser extent, even today, many comic book characters started off as one off stories in anthology titles that gained popularity to such a degree, they came to dominate the title's story output. Action Comics debuted with it's signature character, Superman, and these days it's a title in D.C.'s Superman comic lines. A similar situation exists for Batman and Detective comics, but in some cases the Anthology comic predated it's signature hero. For example, Amazing Fantasy was 15 issues deep before it's star attraction, a friendly neigborhood hero named Spider-man debuted... in what was to be the final issue before the entire magazine ceased production, and Thor first appeared in the 83rd issue of his featuring anthology Journey into Mystery. These days, the "Anthology" title of a major superhero typically retains a second story that will feature a member of the feature hero's cast or a promotional story line for an upcoming new title comic series. Further more comics these days tend to run a serial storyline with each episode being a chapter that will last from 2 to 6 issues and then collected and sold as a "trade" book where the whole story is told.

Cliffhangers originated in golden age Film serials as a gimmick to ensure the audience comes back for the next entry. Typically, a Film serial was intended for kids and featured many popular Superheroes (Superman, Batman, and Captain Marvel (the one that yells "SHAZAM" not the one that Nick Fury has on Beeper) are some classic examples, but Flash Gordon had several series). These were normally cheaper than a theater's evening attractions, which is saying something when the evening shows were a dime, and that included the film, a news reel, a cartoon, and change for popcorn. Even then, day shows often did double features so that could be two films, a news reel, a cartoon, change for your popcorn and three hours for mom and dad to not have to worry about Jr. Cliffhanger endings were staples (so named because they typically had the heroes hanging from a cliff, though the danger where they would break the story did change... but the unresolved situation would hang over the kids head for a full week before he could find out that they were saved within a minute of the show's start). The film genre died as TV came to take over serial formats, though it would see a revival by George Lucas in the form of Star Wars and later Indiana Jones which was a love letter to pulp serials of the day, and later evolved to it's final form, the cinematic universe, where superheroes once again became the top dog.

The genre died when episodic storytelling became much easier on TV, and the promise of finding out more when you "TUNE IN NEXT WEEK" was even cheaper as the shows rarely had a multi-episode story-line. I Love Lucy did several gimmick, the most famous of which was the show's portrayal of Lucile Ball's real life pregnancy. By a lucky chance, the birth of Lucy's TV son aired mere hours before the birth of her real life son (the episode was taped in advance and the script decided to say the TV child was a boy, despite not knowing the real child. The papers did joke that "Lucy sticks to script" the next morning.

Serialized TV grew slowly, but it became much more prominant with the advent of DVD collections of a show's season (over coming the difficulties of people not being able to reliably see a critical episode of a season). These shows still split the episode into mostly "Monster of the week" and "Mytharch shows" with the former dominating the bulk of a single season while the later would often be built close to planned production breaks (Typically Mytharchs would be in the first episode of a season, a cliffhanger surrounding the winter break, and a season finale (Either eliminating the season long story or cliffhanging into the next season). An occasional mytharch story was thrown in the midway point between the mid-season break and the season's opening and closing episode. The rest was pretty much filler (Mytharch and Monster of the week originate from an early user, X-Files, with Mytharch relying on the alien conspiracy while the Monster of the Week was anything but the aliens and rarely connected to anything else, with a few twists thrown in... a few mytharcs started as feeling like monster of the week (Red Museum), while some Monster of the Weeks were deliberate spoofs of the alien plot (Joe Chung's From Outer Space).

Serial literature has been making a comeback however, thanks to the internet and blogs, an author can self publish a story on his/her blog and do a serial installment (typically weekly) and some discussion of notes or behind the scenes or AMA engagements with the audience occupying the wait time between story content. The novel/web novel "Worm" about a superhero/villain is one of the noted early successes of this style with the author having concluded the novel and published it in book format and having produced two other novels in such a format and presently working on a Worm sequel as well. The limitation here is that much of the advertising needs to be self generated, facilitating online engagement from the author that wasn't required from the Magazines of yore.

| improve this answer | |
0

This is "serial" or "episodic" adventure, like many TV shows. Traditionally, such adventures are tied together by some overarching goal or frame story. There must be some reason the character is collecting the items. In The Odyssey, Odysseus endured obstacles along the way to getting home. In The Labors of Hercules, Hercules served his cousin's bizarre whims in return for immortality to atone for an act of madness.

But in modern television, the characters just face adventure after adventure, often right up until they get canceled. A novel should have a more meaningful plot; once the character has all the items, presumably something will happen. But just having the main character grow, learn, and change could be enough. It wouldn't be too different from some Medieval stories that tied episodes together with a final one in which things the character learned in previous adventures allowed him to complete the final challenge (I'm thinking of things like "The Brave Little Tailor"). Even the labors of Hercules actually ended when Hercules managed to drag Cerberus from Hades, and his terrified cousin promised to release him from his labors if he returned Cerberus to Hades--the final episode simply broke the frame story.

| improve this answer | |

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.