0

I put work into making up my own names for spells. However, I feel like they come across as childish when I read over my writing

This was also my impression when re-reading Harry Potter. It really took me out of it when adult characters were shouting these childish, made-up words. But then again, some of the spells used do work and are actually quite iconic (exp. Avada Kedavra)

  • 1
    Are you aware that while, of course, the spells are made up and don't work in the real world, the names are mostly direct borrowings from other real world languages? quora.com/… – Spagirl Oct 16 '19 at 10:19
  • Yes I am aware of that – klippy Oct 16 '19 at 10:36
  • Names? Or Incantations? – Malady Oct 16 '19 at 19:22
  • 2
    Anything that says "Should I" is almost by definition opinion-based. VTC. – Weckar E. Oct 16 '19 at 20:10
7

The natural way of naming things is to use something unique about them that "everybody knows". For example, "linen" comes from the Latin word "linum" which is the ancient name given to the flax plant which provides the fiber to make thread -- literally the plant was named, in translation, "line", an early word for thread, still in use today as "fishing line". Back when the Roman Empire was founded, everybody knew that.

"Linen" was woven from "line". The "flax" plant itself? The word "flax" derives from the Old English word for "plaiting", or weaving. So the plant is named twice from different language roots: Once for the line it produces, once for what you DO with the line; weave it to make cloth. On top of that, "flaxen," often used to describe hair, means pale yellow or golden, which is the actual natural color of the prepared flax threads, which in quantity look like blond hair. Few people know that now, but when it was coined, everybody knew that, "flaxen hair" was a very specific shade of yellow.

In short, names for things tend to be traced to "on the nose" phrases in earlier languages. Just like when you understand most of our own new words, telephone, television, cell phone, computer, calculator, automobile, and so forth.

You can do the same thing with your spells. Find a name for them in English that actually makes sense to you, something uniquely identifiable for this spell and none other. It can be a color, a sound it makes, its function, how it is used, when it is used, a condition required for its use, whatever.

Say for a plot purpose I want a spell called "strong hearing," in Latin that is "audiens forti". But you don't have to use Latin, you could use an etymology dictionary (tells the source of words), and just look up your words: both "strong" and "hear" have roots in old Dutch ("streng horen"), but if you translate "strong hearing" to Dutch you get "sterk gehoor". You could use that as a name.

It is a plausible scenario that the various spells were NOT all discovered in the same place, but all over the world, in a wide variety of languages, and they retain their names from the discoverers. A character that knows a lot about a magic (a professor or teacher or guru) may know this, and mention it to students, and what the words mean.

"This next spell is called 'audiens forti', Latin for 'strong hearing', it will let you hear speech through multiple doors and walls, from any distance that would normally be in sight. but it is a directional spell, you must point a line on which the conversation occurs. And you will hear all conversations on that line, all at once, as if you stood next to the speaker."

And so on. Once you give the reader the idea that the spells are named for reasons, in various languages, they won't think the names are silly. Neither should you. Pick names and derivations you don't find silly, that make sense to you as the name for that spell.

| improve this answer | |
  • this is a very euro-centric answer. and does not at all address the actual question of "should the OP make up words" And it also does not account for why that spells that do the same thing have different incantations in different languages.. or WHY no-magic people can't conjure up even light.. by saying "lumos" Clearly the power of magic does not come from phonetic. Never did... it was a fact implied but never explored. – dolphin_of_france Oct 16 '19 at 20:18
  • every author of magic implied that magic is not words. No-magic people have never been able to cast spells by saying the words. And it is a well established tradition that many wizards can cast spells without speaking.. – dolphin_of_france Oct 16 '19 at 20:25
  • 1
    @dolphin_of_france: The question talked about the names of spells. I would expect a spell to be named not by the words that make it up, as that allows safely speaking about the spell without accidentally invoking it. For example, casting the “audiens forti” spell would not involve saying the words “audiens forti”. Just as I don't usually need to use the word “computer” in order to use a computer; I require the word to talk about the computer. – celtschk Oct 17 '19 at 7:12
  • @dolphin_of_france Like the OP, I am talking about the names of spells. And my answer perfectly accounts for why spells would have different names in different languages; the same reason one plant is called both "flax" and "linum", the names derive from different cultures naming the same thing! As for where the power of magic comes from: Magic is imaginary, where the power comes from is up to the author. It could be entirely true that words without power don't work, and that power without appropriate spoken words will fail: that it takes a combination. It's up to the author to decide. – Amadeus-Reinstate-Monica Oct 17 '19 at 10:29
  • @celtschk: that's just it... SAYING the word doesn't cast the spell. That is canon, in all english stories about magic. saying "Avada Kedavra" doesn't kill anyone. In the book it specifically says, when a wizard says the words, the wizard has to mean to kill someone for the spell to actually cause damage and kill. It is the WILL of the wizard that causes death, not the sound of "Avada Kedavra" .. So when a professor gives a talk about the unforgivable curses, he can say "Avada Kedavra" without killing any of the students – dolphin_of_france Oct 17 '19 at 14:49
0

You can totally do it.

But you need to establish the rules that allow the readers to accept it.

So in your story, maybe a Japanese wizard would cast the same spells as a Western wizard using Japanese incantations rather than Latin or Greek based words.

And then maybe you can explain that the words themselves have no power, the power comes from the mind of the caster.

This is by the way totally canon, per western literary tradition. It is a well established fact that a spell spoken by a no-magic person does nothing. Hence sounds made by human is not the source of magic. It is also an established fact that many wizards can cast spell without speaking.

Therefore, it is likely all that casting with words does is to help a wizard conjure up the idea of what he / she wants to do. So if a wizard wants light, all he has to do is to say "lumos", "light", "光" or anything that helps conjure up the notion of light in the mind, and the magic within creates that light.

If you do that, you can choose whatever words you need for your spells.

"pew pew pew" and bursts of wizard laser shoot out of his wand...

and let me tell you, for wizard laser, if i were a wizard, i would totally pick "pew pew pew" And I am a grown man.

Easy to say, fast to cast. Exactly what you need in wizard laser blasts.

This also means, another wizard can say "undam levis tandem singulari" to cast a burst of light of a single wavelength light (which is really laser).

| improve this answer | |

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.