0

I'm writing a thesis about Basel Accords.

In a section, I use the letter w to indicate the weights of the assets used to calculate the capital requirement.

In another section, can I use again the letter w to indicate the weights of the securities which a portfolio is made of?

6
  • Welcome to Writing.SE CarLaTeX, glad you found us. We have a tour and help center you might wish to check out. Has there been a source that told you you couldn't do this? I'd not seeing why w can't be used consistently for weight.
    – Cyn
    Commented Sep 20, 2019 at 5:00
  • @Cyn Hi! I found you through TeX.SE. No source told me I can't do it, it's only something I thought because in the first case the weights are set by the Basel rules, for example 0% for cash, 50% for residential mortgage, etc., whereas in the second case their are actually weights (the sum of the weights gives 1).
    – CarLaTeX
    Commented Sep 20, 2019 at 5:11
  • 1
    It would be great to introduce different symbols for different purposes in order to avoid confusion. Moreover, PhD theses and often research papers have a list of symbols used, which, in a way, ensures that no symbol is repeated. Having gone through a few hundred papers till date, I cannot recall any instance where symbols were reused.
    – Barun
    Commented Sep 25, 2019 at 12:56
  • @Barun Thank you for your comment. I was unsure because in both occasions they are "weights", but listen to you and to Mark Baker I'm using different symbols.
    – CarLaTeX
    Commented Sep 25, 2019 at 17:14
  • As a mathematician, yes, of course you can, as long as it's clear. But conventions vary by field, so see what other people in your area do. Commented Dec 28, 2020 at 10:10

1 Answer 1

4

In any work in which you use symbols, you have to establish the scope of each symbol when you use it. There is nothing to say that you can't use the same symbol to mean different things in different places as long as you clearly scope it each time it is used.

On the other hand, you should not assume that if you decide to scope a particular symbol to the whole book that the reader will necessarily recognize that the symbol you use on page 134 is the same one you last mentioned on page 17. Unless you use a symbol consistently and frequently throughout a book, the reader is likely to treat is as local even if you intend it to be global.

So either way, make sure you define your symbols each time you use them, whether you scope them globally or locally.

However, if you have used a symbol to mean one thing on pages 17, 23, 47, 52, 73, and 87, you probably shouldn't use it to mean something different on page 103 because by that point your readers will probably see it as a global symbol even if you have been scoping it locally each time.

Or, to put it another way, consider if your past use of this symbol or of symbols in general suggests to the reader that this or other symbols have a consistent meaning or if it suggests that they have individual local meanings, and use them accordingly.

1
  • 1
    Thank you for your very useful reply! Indeed, I use the symbol with the first meaning throughout the thesis, so perhaps it's better to use another symbol for the second meaning.
    – CarLaTeX
    Commented Sep 20, 2019 at 5:17

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service and acknowledge you have read our privacy policy.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.