4

I have a prologue I'm working on right now, however, I want to add an introduction as well. What I mean is that I want to write about why and how I created the story (an introduction), but I want some backstory (the prologue, what the character was doing before the official story happened, from their perspective). Is it okay to add the two together, or should I ditch the introduction and stick with the prologue, or vice versa?

  • 3
    You're confusing your terms: a Prologue is fiction, narrative. An Introduction is you sharing your own thoughts; writing introductory comments before the story (or even the prologue) begins. I'll edit to correct, but I hope you're clear on the difference, or answers will be confusing :) – Standback Jan 18 '17 at 16:43
3

You absolutely can have both an introduction and a prologue. Both are concepts which are well-familiar to readers; they will not be confused by it. If you do have both, the Introduction comes first, before any of the fiction begins.

If there's any cause for concern, it's of wearying the reader before they get to the "real" story. You're basically suggesting that readers go through two "reading experiences" before they start your "actual" book. First impressions matter, readers set books down quickly, so anything "extra" you add to the beginning of the book, needs to be engaging and draw the reader in.

So I think that's really your main consideration here:

  • Does the Introduction draw readers in? If no, consider making it an afterward instead.
  • Does the Prologue draw readers in? If no, consider skipping it, or rewriting it, or weaving the same information in later in the book.

If you're not sure whether your Introduction and Prologue are engaging enough, well, that's the kind of thing Beta Readers are fantastic for :)

| improve this answer | |
  • Related: some questions on the difficulties of prologues: Elmore Leonard said Avoid Prologues… Why? , When is a prologue useful? – Standback Jan 18 '17 at 16:54
  • Since you said the introduction comes first, I assume I'd write the prologue, then the introduction, then get into the story, as I want to do? – ExoMute Jan 18 '17 at 17:05
  • I would bet many people skip the intro/prologue while reading in many instances just to avoid the fatigue you're talking about. I've been known to do that ... if the book doesn't capture my attention quickly, it runs the risk of getting put down. I've often found intro/prologues to be arduous. That usually sets my mental "tone" for the rest of the book. – Pᴀᴜʟsᴛᴇʀ2 Jan 18 '17 at 17:06
  • @ExoMute : Are you asking what order to write in? Whatever order you want. You can start from the last chapter, if you feel like it :) But in the final arrangement, the order would be Introduction, Prologue, Chapter 1. – Standback Jan 18 '17 at 17:11
  • But if you want advice, I'd actually recommend starting off writing with Chapter 1. That's the core of your book; the Prologue and Introduction don't stand without that. Easier to introduce a book you've already written, than one you haven't... – Standback Jan 18 '17 at 17:12
0

If this is fiction, and you are unknown, your book should start with Chapter 1. No matter how clever you are, readers don't really give a rip about your process. Just start the story the best you can.

Prologues are common in certain genres like fantasy. You're far more likely to get readers who skip them compared to ones who get excited about reading the prologue. And an introduction? When you have a few bestsellers to your name, your loving audience will eat that stuff up; but until you've got bestsellers, introductions are for tools.

| improve this answer | |

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.