2

I'm considering working in writing. I'd like to save myself some time in case I'm not up for the job. How do I go about evaluating myself as a professional writer? I was going to ask for a peer review of some samples to do the task of evaluation but I saw that peer review of written material is considered off-topic here. So, I have to evaluate myself and don't know how.

  • 1
    Not really an answer since there's nothing else like it, but I thought I'd mention it: I got started in writing through an online forum, writing fan fiction. I was just having fun with other authors. We all wrote and commented on each other's works. I started a fan fiction contest in that forum, and use it to this day to gather criticism on my writing. For me, it's been a great way to improve my skill and get free and honest feedback (that's one thing you'll get more of from complete strangers on the internet: honest feedback). – Thomas Myron Nov 7 '16 at 19:47
  • The upshot is, you can't. Writing quality is subjective. Grammar checkers can't confirm coherence. You can't proofread yourself either. You need outside opinions. Try critiquecircle.com and I agree with @ThomasMyron that a supportive fanfic community can do wonders for your writing. – Lauren Ipsum Nov 7 '16 at 19:54
3

You evaluate yourself as a professional writer by submitting writing to respected publications and seeing if they offer you money for it. The beauty of writing is that there is no other criteria, no other qualification you need to possess, no licence you need to obtain. If it is good enough, it will sell. But by the same token, there is no infallible test of whether you will make it or not.

There are, of course, much easier paths to take. You could become a technical writer or a copywriter. Those are much less uncertain paths. But assuming that you mean you want to be a commercial book author, I don't think there is an accurate litmus test.

Developing as a writer takes time. It takes a lot of writing and, equally importantly, lots of attentive reading. The attentive part is different. Writers read differently from other people. We pay attention to how things are written, what works, what doesn't, and why. (See Francine Prose's book Reading Like a Writer.)

Along the way you can submit your work for feedback. Bad feedback does not mean you can't succeed, only that you have not learned enough yet. Nor is bad feedback even a reliable guide to if your work is publishable. Lots of critique groups would rip to shreds works that have sold millions of copies (think Dan Brown or the 50 Shades of Grey author).

But the strongest indication of whether you can succeed may be in your own question. It can be a very long journey to publication, and an even longer one to earning a living at it. It is the Everest of writing careers and most people who try it die on the mountain (or never get past base camp). If you are as ambivalent about it as you seem to be from your question, it is not likely you will have the resolve to get to the top.

From any rational standpoint, writing books is an insane way to try to make a living. The only possible reason for trying is that you are unable to stop yourself. If you are capable of stopping yourself from becoming a writer, do so. We are a ship of fools. Swim if you can.

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.