Timeline for Is it a bad idea to design a purposefully inconsistent magic system?
Current License: CC BY-SA 4.0
12 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| May 13 at 13:39 | answer | added | Jared Smith | timeline score: 0 | |
| May 13 at 7:16 | comment | added | infinitezero | To me there seems to be an obvious solution: Dimensional Travel + Transformation seems way more complicated. Just make it two spells (or another version) and there's no inconsistency at all. | |
| May 12 at 18:02 | answer | added | NomadMaker | timeline score: 0 | |
| May 12 at 3:04 | answer | added | zacronos | timeline score: 4 | |
| May 11 at 12:07 | answer | added | Silver | timeline score: -5 | |
| May 11 at 6:05 | comment | added | David Z | Honestly, I don't even see what's inconsistent about this. (Well, maybe I kind of do after reading the answers, but definitely nothing about this seemed inconsistent just from the question itself.) I guess it doesn't matter now, but I feel like the question may have been improved if you explained the inconsistency. And one other thing that isn't clear to me, at least: are you trying to write an inconsistent system because you specifically want an inconsistent system (e.g. to confuse readers), or just because you have a system in mind that you want to use and it seems inconsistent to you? | |
| May 11 at 3:35 | answer | added | Mary | timeline score: 7 | |
| May 11 at 2:03 | history | became hot network question | |||
| May 10 at 19:49 | answer | added | Amadeus | timeline score: 18 | |
| May 10 at 18:18 | review | Close votes | |||
| May 18 at 3:08 | |||||
| S May 10 at 17:56 | review | First questions | |||
| May 10 at 17:58 | |||||
| S May 10 at 17:56 | history | asked | Talbot | CC BY-SA 4.0 |