Timeline for Abbreviation for "figures" in scientific papers
Current License: CC BY-SA 3.0
11 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mar 13, 2018 at 2:05 | answer | added | Jixin Wei | timeline score: 4 | |
| Dec 10, 2015 at 18:17 | answer | added | Benjamín | timeline score: 9 | |
| Jun 2, 2015 at 4:10 | answer | added | N S K Harsh | timeline score: 2 | |
| Jun 6, 2012 at 22:56 | vote | accept | JAM | ||
| Jun 4, 2012 at 2:15 | history | tweeted | twitter.com/#!/StackWriters/status/209468337435049985 | ||
| Jun 3, 2012 at 6:38 | history | edited | Standback |
edited tags
|
|
| Jun 3, 2012 at 6:16 | history | migrated | from english.stackexchange.com (revisions) | ||
| Jun 3, 2012 at 3:59 | answer | added | Jim | timeline score: 8 | |
| Jun 3, 2012 at 3:58 | comment | added | Alex B. | It depends on the style manual you're using or conventions adopted for a particular publication. Ask your editors. | |
| Jun 3, 2012 at 3:27 | comment | added | tchrist | Why would you abbreviate “Figures”, anyway? Yeah sure, academic papers will say to “see Fig. 42”, but I cannot imagine an instance where “Figures” itself would both occur and require abbreviation. | |
| Jun 3, 2012 at 2:51 | history | asked | JAM | CC BY-SA 3.0 |