Skip to main content
Tweeted twitter.com/StackWriting/status/1319836191479484416

Should items separated by Oxford commas be alphabetical?

When writing a list of items, should they be alphabetical?

The late Jurassic periods are Tithonian, Kimmeridgian., and Oxfordian.

better?

The late Jurassic periods are Kimmeridgian, Oxfordian, and Tithonian.

Should items separated by Oxford commas be alphabetical?

When writing a list of items, should they be alphabetical?

The late Jurassic periods are Tithonian, Kimmeridgian. and Oxfordian.

better?

The late Jurassic periods are Kimmeridgian, Oxfordian, and Tithonian.

Should items separated by commas be alphabetical?

When writing a list of items, should they be alphabetical?

The late Jurassic periods are Tithonian, Kimmeridgian, and Oxfordian.

better?

The late Jurassic periods are Kimmeridgian, Oxfordian, and Tithonian.

Became Hot Network Question
Title fix
Link
Sciborg
  • 8.8k
  • 1
  • 27
  • 56

should Should items in a oxford commaseparated by Oxford commas be alphabetical?

Removed software formatting
Source Link
Chenmunka
  • 1.3k
  • 4
  • 21
  • 34

When writing a list of items, should they be alphabetical?

The late Jurassic periods are Tithonian, Kimmeridgian. and Oxfordian.

The late Jurassic periods are Tithonian, Kimmeridgian. and Oxfordian.

better?

The late Jurassic periods are Kimmeridgian, Oxfordian, and Tithonian.

The late Jurassic periods are Kimmeridgian, Oxfordian, and Tithonian.

When writing a list of items, should they be alphabetical?

The late Jurassic periods are Tithonian, Kimmeridgian. and Oxfordian.

better?

The late Jurassic periods are Kimmeridgian, Oxfordian, and Tithonian.

When writing a list of items, should they be alphabetical?

The late Jurassic periods are Tithonian, Kimmeridgian. and Oxfordian.

better?

The late Jurassic periods are Kimmeridgian, Oxfordian, and Tithonian.

Source Link
Honk
  • 237
  • 2
  • 5
Loading