Skip to main content
added 101 characters in body
Source Link
Stu W
  • 4.2k
  • 2
  • 16
  • 20

Interesting notion. If you consider how a normal scientific research paper is set up :

Title

Authors

Abstract

Introduction

Materials and Methods

Statistical analysis

Discussion of Results/effect of bias

Conclusions

Suggestions for further research

Financial disclosures

I would place your chosen name in both abstract and introduction but not in author or title. You maycan then use such nomenclature throughout. The name yourself whateveritself doesn't really matter; personally I'd make it funny in an ironic way. A recent brain protein was named "sonic hedgehog," for instance. You should also disclose in the discussion section the bias of being one's own researcher.

Interesting notion. If you consider how a normal scientific research paper is set up :

Title

Authors

Abstract

Introduction

Materials and Methods

Statistical analysis

Discussion of Results/effect of bias

Conclusions

Suggestions for further research

Financial disclosures

I would place your chosen name in both abstract and introduction but not in author or title. You may name yourself whatever. A recent brain protein was named "sonic hedgehog," for instance. You should also disclose in the discussion section the bias of being one's own researcher.

Interesting notion. If you consider how a normal scientific research paper is set up :

Title

Authors

Abstract

Introduction

Materials and Methods

Statistical analysis

Discussion of Results/effect of bias

Conclusions

Suggestions for further research

Financial disclosures

I would place your chosen name in both abstract and introduction but not in author or title. You can then use such nomenclature throughout. The name itself doesn't really matter; personally I'd make it funny in an ironic way. A recent brain protein was named "sonic hedgehog," for instance. You should also disclose in the discussion section the bias of being one's own researcher.

Source Link
Stu W
  • 4.2k
  • 2
  • 16
  • 20

Interesting notion. If you consider how a normal scientific research paper is set up :

Title

Authors

Abstract

Introduction

Materials and Methods

Statistical analysis

Discussion of Results/effect of bias

Conclusions

Suggestions for further research

Financial disclosures

I would place your chosen name in both abstract and introduction but not in author or title. You may name yourself whatever. A recent brain protein was named "sonic hedgehog," for instance. You should also disclose in the discussion section the bias of being one's own researcher.